As another commenter has pointed out, you're for 'an anti-racist' society, but you have no real methodology for getting there. The Kim's have 'specific strategies and tactics that effectively significantly measurably and permanently reduce racist policies, practices, rules, regulations and laws' - their policy is to shoot anyone who disagrees with them. What is your policy? Because if it isn't democracy, it's presumably autocracy?

Your argument is effectively circular, it's an appeal to be more 'anti-racist' without defining what that is. If you cannot define a thing, it's subjective, if it's your subjective definition then you can run an autocratic state. If it's an idea that's still up for discussion, then we're back into a democracy.