I can't tell you how many times I've been blocked for asking a simple question that shows an obvious flaw in an argument... I've lost count. The point the author wishes to make is one that only people who agree with her world view agree with. There's no discussion with people set to broadcast, their arguments are flimsy and their capacity for debate is minimal. A false sense of moral superiority is built into the system because of unchecked agreement - and as such, dissent (of any kind) becomes evidence of oppression and you are immediately called names and/or blocked. It was never about real debate, it was about a rally call to action. Thus is the nature of ideologues. Kudos for trying though :o)