I didn't argue for repealing Roe - I said the arguments for repealing Roe were valid because the legal arguments on which Roe rested were flawed. Read it again.

I AM PRO-CHOICE. I don't know how many times I have to write this. It seems not to register. Go and read my articles where I explicitly state I am pro choice. Go and read the comments where I make the same statement numerous times to different people.

I didn't go out to bat for Brett Kavanaugh... I went out and said (in summary) 'I don't think a public job interview is the right place to have an ersatz criminal trial' - I think that's what the courts should be for and that should've been settled by the police and the courts and not by Senators in front of TV cameras. I stand by that statements - that's not defending rapists, that's defending due process.

If you go back and read the article I wrote about Roe, you will see that the 14th Amendment is also a due process argument. It was the wrong argument to make to make the law - thousands of legal scholars have said this. It isn't a secret. Go and read what RBG thought because my views are in line with hers. The law should always have been argued under the right to freedom of religion - but it wasn't.

Do the required reading and then come back.https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/05/06/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-wade/

I think you SHOULD BE entitled to the same rights as men. You keep insisting that I don't and waffling on about bodily autonomy. I think it's important you stop reading what you think you read and actually dissect the arguments I'm making before you go off like a bomb in the comments