I suspect that 100% of all the the boards are made up of people who are economically advantaged. Changing their genitals or their skin colour is irrelevant. You need boards made up of economically disadvantaged people who bring a different concept of how to run a company that is more centred on its workforce.

Swapping the sort of men who want to be on boards for the sort of women who want to be on boards will do very little. If progressives were genuinely committed to change, then the board structure itself would be overturned… but that’s not how it works.

When everyone stops playing musical chairs with their identities and engaging in power games flanking manoeuvres, only then will we see the people who never had chairs to begin with.

More women and minority groups would be the eventual result of a genuine push for change at the economic level - but the middle class progressive would have to get themselves out of the way first - and they don’t see themselves as part of the problem, only the enforcers of the solution.