Not quite. I would suggest watching (as I have) with Emily D Baker… an ex-attorney who guides everyone through the processes on her YouTube channel. Many trauma survivors both male and female are watching within that community and have found the process cathartic. When you write in support of someone without seeing the evidence (for whatever reason) then you’re in danger of making the wrong arguments based on hearsay and speculation.

Go and watch. Do the closing arguments if nothing else. Take care of yourself as you do so - if you choose to watch more then Emily Baker will guide you through the trigger warnings as many of the people who are watching have been. Listening to Amber was tough on the stand when she was under cross, but I have worked with many abuse victims in my time - and her testimony did not match my experience working with them. That doesn’t mean she’s lying, and it doesn’t mean she’s evil, I’ve argued on my own medium account that she needs a lot of support and compassion - but she should never have been encouraged to write an op-ed.

However, until you explore all the evidence - you may be in danger of vilifying the wrong person. If indeed anyone needs to be vilified at all (they don’t). If you haven’t examined the case, listened to the testimonies and won’t do so, then I’d argue it’s morally incorrect to try and identify the victim in this case by their genitals and generalisation alone.