So if people words use that one racial group find offensive, that offence is valid even if the intention behind the word use is more nuanced…. Like it was read from a book, or people were singing a song with existing lyrics, or quoting a historical person. There are no mitigating circumstances which can be considered at any point…

But if a word is used by someone in said racial group, and it is pointed out this word carries great offence to another group - it can be safely ignored, because any attempt to point this out is itself racist.

That’s a neat little bit of rhetoric packaging you’ve got there. Personally, I think people saying any word needs to be seen in context and policing speech is a very stupid thing to do…. But that’s not what you’re arguing, you’re arguing the right to have all the cakes and eat it too. You want the right to police speech but never be policed in return.

That’s pure unadulterated hypocrisy in action and anyone with half a brain should be able to see this argument for what this is.