Sure. Intuition is there for a reason, but intuition can lead you astray. Intuition works on a confirmation bias basis - you intuit there is something wrong with person X, and it turns out person X is an evil person... your intuition was correct. You intuit there is something wrong with person Y and it turns out there's nothing wrong with person Y, then you don't register this as a failure in your intuitive system. You downplay it and continue as you were - it's an excellent survival strategy but it's excellently coated in confirmation bias.
And the reason we have trials and the courtroom is to stop people having intuitive thoughts enacted in law, we parse out the evidence, we ask people to think about things on more than the basis of their feelings. We might have some prior intuitive thoughts, but unless those are borne out by evidence, we can't (actually I'll say shouldn't) convict people.
With the Depp trial, and as someone who has worked with victims and abusers, this was a mixed bag. My intuitive read here is that both people are vulnerable and shouldn't have been left alone together for more than about twenty seconds at a time. Here's my view in case you're interested.
