Sure. Until you modify it with ‘until it’s proven in a court of law that he’s not’ and then I’ll refer to him as ‘Trump the criminal’. Let me be clear, Donald Trump is innocent, I have thoughts about what he might or might not have done in the past, but my thoughts are irrelevant to his status as either innocent or guilty. I am not a judge or jury. To tell you what I think as though I have the power to circumvent the legal process and announce my hunch, feelings, or concept of right and wrong as proof should be treated with caution.

Not because I might be wrong, but simply because it will be used against me by people with a vested interest in overturning the legal process. When I say ‘trump is innocent’ I am not announcing that as a permanent state of being, nor am i stating it as an unsubstantiated belief. It is a legal fact. We muddy the waters at our peril. :o)