The flaw in this argument is that you've presumed that all black people, asian people and woke people behave in a coherent and cogent way. That in some way this overarching identity creates homogeny of action and intention. It doesn't. This leads to a continuing bun fight in which ideological groups can be pitted against each other, using wokeness and their own subjective interpretation as a weapon.

What differentiates what you've done here to Laura Huang, from what she did last week? Nothing. Let me demonstrate how quickly you can generate a confusing mess shitshow of identity politics. Ready?

I can see from your biography that you're a writer who identifies as he/him. Clearly buoyed up by your own patriarchal overconfidence, you have attempted to 'mansplain' to a female Harvard professor how she's wrong about something that matters to her on an individual and passionate level. You had no right to jump in and start dictating, penis first, what a woman should think.

The reality is, you both have decent points to make - but it's drowned out by WHO you are to say things, not WHAT you're saying. Exacting the value of a contribution by the value of the immutable characteristics of the speaker. That's all flavours of flawed when it's the exact problem you're trying to solve - and exactly why I now identify as a penguin.