The problem with this argument is that women aren't spending enough time with bears. If women spent as much time with bears as they did with men - then the comparison would be fair, we'd have better statistics about bear behaviours. The odds of being attacked by a bear are about 2 in a million and you might have an 86% chance of surviving, but this statistic comes from the relatively small amount of times bears and humans come into contact - comparatively with how often men and women come into contact.

Absence of information leads to erroneous conclusions. If we're serious about this, we're going to need a lot of bears and a lot of women prepared to go into the woods and take one for the team.

Also, as someone who worked in child protection - just because we're 93.6% of sexual abuse offenders were men, doesn't mean we should rub our hands together and conclude these stats are complete. You have to account for all the information you aren't getting. Do I think that 93.6% of all sexual offences are committed by men? I'm not convinced. I got ten years at the dark underbelly of society that suggests otherwise and if you change the questions and look in different places, you get different answers... see Stemple and work in juvenile prisons etc. :o)