Well hello there..... I'm going to argue two things (because my name requires it) the first is that it is really important to continue to follow and read people if you disagree with them. To only follow those with whom you are concordant on all matters is not a good way for democracy to head - we do not have to agree entirely about Capitalism.

My views on Capitalism are best summed up in this article from last year - https://medium.com/p/9067be5e7a1c This is the root cause analysis and thinking you're looking for.

it's titled 'Capitalism is the best thing to happen to us since fire' - so I hope you can see my views on what capitalism is and does are a bit more nuanced than 'this is shit'. In fact, many of the points you have raised are covered in the article.

Where we're likely to disagree is on whether the market should be allowed to continue without Government interference. I don't. I think there needs to be progressive distribution of wealth (because I'm a socialist) - but I think we have to be very careful about how that is done. Capitalism when played to its full extent is a zero sum game in which one person gets all the money and lots of people get none of the money. If Governments had not interfered, we would still have slavery - on account of slavery being the most efficient capitalist model avaiable.

I am happy to debate both the merits and pitfalls of Capitalism at length - but it is misguided to assume anyone who disagrees with your conclusions must be an idiot (Or in this case an idiot Penguin). It is even less perspicacious to put those people on mute. Read the article, come back and debate me on the nature of how Capitalism can only work if it is sufficiently harnessed, and how easily it can be exploited by sociopaths and psychopaths without someone capping market forces.

One can be pro-capitalism (and I am) whilst rejecting unfettered greed (which I also do)