What I did here was reverse the authors original position. It's an idiotic reply based on the premise of the original article. In which Incels (who likely do hate women) are lumped together with fathers for justice (who want specific legal changes to promote fairness in the court system around custody). These people have very little in common with each other on a social, political or philosophical level.

But making that case normally gets people called a misogynst. In fact, when challenged on her views by another commenter, the OP replied 'I'm not interested in talking to any men'. So instead, I did what the OP did, I lumped a whole bunch of different female demographics together and made the assertion they all hated men. That way, readers might understand the flaw in her reasoning in the original article.

So yes, idiotic reply indeed but it's making a wider point about the flaws of idiotic philosophical positions. And no, lesbians don't hate men.... also, lesbians aren't a hegemony. Some of them might. Most of them don't. Depends. People be complicated like that. :o)