What you've got there is something called 'confirmation bias'. I'll address these issues quickly so we don't get bogged down too much, though I suspect (given your tone) that our discussion is already over.

1. Will always criticise men preying on minors because it's repugnant for men to do so. Will also criticise women pretending adult women aged nineteen are twenty are naive children who don't understand the implications of their behaviour and must be protected at all costs, I challenge them. That's disingenuous and disempowering and pretty much against what I consider to be feminism. You want equality under the law, you stick to the law. If you read my pieces widely you will see I very much stick to 'what the law says' approach - otherwise we end up with subjective fuckduggery and accusations like yours.

2. None of my comments will be hate-filled. That's not how I write.

3. I comment on many articles. Stick around, read more widely. You will see me debating with plenty of people on plenty of issues.

4. Don't resent women at all as far as I'm aware. I may even be one for all you know. I'm a Penguin, I don't play the identity games. For the record, am not a victim nor would I identify as one.

5. Constantly attempting to accuse me of sexual exploitation of minors is beneath you. As are fairly spurious conclusions you've drawn about my bitterness and resentment. These things simply aren't there.

6. The final paragraph speaks for itself... it's something I come across a lot on Medium, particularly in the 'woke' quarters'. the entire 'I won't be responding further' means you feel your accusations cannot be responded to, they exist entirely as a true statement and nobody need look into your words any further or consider any form of rebuttal.

This flawed methodology is one of the reasons why I write on this platform - because people who make allegations and then refuse to discuss them, provide any evidence or engage in any meaningful conversation about what they think are dangerous.