When I find an argument that I believe to be wrong, I challenge it. Cis people doing performative identity politics is hands down the worst, because you end up with bullshit like womxn - but condemning it whilst simultaneouly playing it, that's disingenuous.

I'm an equal opportunity penguin. People can be wrong regardless of what their genitals and brains are. That also applies to their age, their skin colour and who they want to take to bed. Nobody said inclusion had to be nice, they just said it had to be inclusive.

And I know you're being sarcastic about the engagement boost - but you're welcome, you're a good writer and it's a good article. I just disagree with about half of it on a fundamental philosophical level and think it should be challenged.