Argumentative Penguin
1 min readJun 17, 2022

--

Yeah... I'm going to say exactly that. I doubt the vast majority of people give much of a crap about their marriage or the case. Unless you're plugged into celebrity culture then you're not going to know the ins and outs of this - let alone follow it in any great depth. The jury would've faced a voir dire and been cleared for duty by either the judge or both counsels - I genuinely believe they made their decision based on the evidence (or lack thereof).

As I've argued before, I think the jury overreached, but they did so because of a bad legal strategy on Heard's part - and I strongly suspect she will be served an injunction if she continues to repeat the things she's been saying in the media. We can't ever KNOW the truth of any matter, and trial by jury working to a pre-arranged fair standard is the best answer we have.

--

--

Argumentative Penguin
Argumentative Penguin

Written by Argumentative Penguin

Playwright. Screenwriter. Penguin. Fan of rationalism and polite discourse. Find me causing chaos in the comments. Contact: argumentativepenguin@outlook.com

Responses (1)