Yes, but that wasn't the point being made. The point being made was men ALWAYS win. Whilst such a statement might generate a lot of claps and whoops and cheers it's demonstrably false.

And not just demonstrably false. A man who had near limitless power for thirty years, and could end careers with a click of his fingers, a man with near infinite financial resources and with the protection of powerful people - he was taken to court, he was tried and he was found guilty and sent to jail. The same thing would've happened to Epstein if he hadn't topped himself much to the delight of decent people around the world.

Should it have taken 30 years? No. Should it have gone on for as long as it did? No. Do men ALWAYS win? This particular piece of evidence suggests not. And that's important, because when you start discounting piles of evidence of abuse against men (as this author did with Johnny Depp) you don't continue to hold abusers accountable in law courts, you set up the same problem as you had before sans penis.

https://medium.com/lucid-nightmare/how-amber-heard-crashed-the-course-of-feminism-c0ec43ff7a52