Argumentative Penguin
3 min readJan 9, 2025

--

You're a little off base here. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) was established by the Home Secretary in 2015 to look at the extent to which institutions in England and Wales have discharged their duty to protect children from sexual abuse. It was published in 2022 and chaired by Alexis Jay OBE. Whilst I'm all for kicking the Tories, they actually didn't shirk on this one. It was commissioned by Cameron's team.

It's worth a read.

Three recommendations form the centrepiece of the Inquiry’s work. I've highlighted the ones in bold that will actually make a difference.

The first relates to the introduction of a statutory requirement of mandatory reporting. In effect, it requires individuals in certain employments (paid or voluntary) and professions to report allegations of child sexual abuse to the relevant authorities. Failure to do so in some circumstances could lead to the commission of a new criminal offence of failure to report an allegation of child sexual abuse when required to do so.

The second concerns the establishment of a national redress scheme for England and for Wales, to provide some monetary redress for child sexual abuse for those who have been let down by institutions in the past. This is a fixed-term scheme with straightforward processes to ensure that, as far as possible, victims and survivors secure efficient access to the help they need. The redress scheme is not a substitute for criminal or civil justice systems and it does not replace the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. The government should seek contributions to the scheme from the institutions affected.

The third recommendation is intended to secure the long-term spotlight on child sexual abuse through the creation of a Child Protection Authority (CPA) in England and in Wales. The CPAs will have powers to inspect any institution associated with children. They will not replace current inspectorates in relation to the statutory authorities, but may require inspection of those authorities by existing inspectorates. The CPAs over time will become centres of expertise, and may extend their child protection functions to other forms of harm experienced by children. They will also, in due course, monitor implementation of the Inquiry’s recommendations and report regularly on progress.

Other recommendations in this report include: a single set of core data relating to child sexual abuse and child sexual exploitation; the creation of a cabinet-level Minister for Children; a public awareness campaign on child sexual abuse; a ban on the use of pain compliance techniques on children in custodial institutions; amendment of the Children Act 1989 to give parity of legal protection to children in care; registration of care staff in residential care, and staff in young offender institutions and secure training centres; improved compliance with statutory duties to inform the Disclosure and Barring Service about individuals who may pose a risk of harm to children; extending the disclosure regime to those working with children overseas; extended use of the barred list of people unsuitable for work with children; more robust age-verification requirements for the use of online platforms and services; mandatory online pre-screening for sexual images of children; a guarantee of specialist therapeutic support for child victims of sexual abuse; a code of practice for access to records pertaining to child sexual abuse; removal of the three-year limitation period for personal injury claims brought by victims; and further changes to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme.

--

--

Argumentative Penguin
Argumentative Penguin

Written by Argumentative Penguin

Playwright. Screenwriter. Penguin. Fan of rationalism and polite discourse. Find me causing chaos in the comments. Contact: argumentativepenguin@outlook.com

Responses (1)